Do you remember the Harry and Louise ads used by the health insurance industry to help defeat the Clinton health care initiative in the 1990’s? Chances are today a couple like Harry and Louise, who were so happy with their employer-provided health insurance plan then, are worrying now about whether they can afford the premiums, co-pays, and deductibles, or they may not have any health insurance at all. In the past few years, the number of employers offering any health coverage has slipped from 7 in 10 to 6 in 10.
In fact, when medical bills now prompt more than 60 percent of U.S. bankruptcies. This is a dramatic shift from when in the late 1960’s I did a study for the Bankruptcy Court of Western Missouri to determine why people were taking bankruptcy. Only one in fifty – just 2% – cited medical bills as the reason.
Who doesn’t know someone who has delayed or gone without treatment because they can’t afford it and don’t have health insurance to cover what they need? How ironic considering Americans spend more per capita on health care than any other advanced country.
While there is no single reason for our health care predicament, one factor that contributes mightily to what prompts so many personal health calamities are are big insurance companies motivated primarily by profit, are systems for denying care at any chance. Consider how they routinely deny coverage to people who consider themselves to be in good or excellent health. Here, for example, are some of the grounds insurance companies are using to prevent people from qualifying for health insurance:
allergies, breast implants, ear infections, herpes, high blood pressure, impotence, infertility, mild depression, migraines,miscarriage, pregnancy “expectant fatherhood”, planned adoption, psoriasis, recurrent tonsillitis, ringworm, swelling from a spider bite, three months of psychological counseling after a marriage breakup, and varicose veins.
The shame is that every American could have health insurance for about what is being spent on health care today if we did just one thing – wring out the administrative cost and profit out of health insurance that accounts for one dollar in four of what we pay for health insurance. Before 1990, insurance companies like Blue Cross charged only about 5% for their services. Even today non-profit systems like Kaiser Permanente and Medicare can offer care for less than 5% for such costs, not 25%; Canadian Health Insurance runs below 3.2%.
In other words, we know about one dollar in every five could be saved from what’s now going into processing paper, corporate marketing, executive bonuses, and shareholder profits.
How could this happen? Many people advocate Medicare for All. How might this be funded? Congressman Dennis Kucinich calculates a 7.7% payroll tax will enable universal coverage. The State of California calculates that a 4% payroll and a 2% income tax would provide health coverage for all Californians.
But there are other alternatives, too, such as:
Returning to an all cash system and allowing new community-based health insurance plans and pricing to emerge. Right now the cash price for health care in the U.S. is a fraction of those billed insurance companies, exceeding the co-pays. They could enable U.S. health care costs more in line with those in countries that are now attracting medical tourism when people who needing hip replacements, for example, spend $10,000 on travel in order to get a new hip for $5,400 instead of the $45,000 it would cost in the U.S.
One example of the kind of insurance companies that could emerge is the Freelancers Insurance Company in New York State. The for-profit company is wholly owned by the nonprofit Freelancers Union. It insures 25,000 independent workers and family members charging premiums more than a third below what they would otherwise pay for health insurance. Another example is Grand Junction, Colorado. Such a plan would be possible in an Elm Street Economy.
Regardless of the alternative we settle upon, no one should profit from insuring the illness of others. We need to wring the administrative costs out of the system, provide professionals with a decent income, and quality health care for all without raising the overall cost of health spending.
Let’s use our voices and voting power to make this happen. It can start by creating local Elm Street Economies.
Comments on the substance of the blogs are welcome. If you have other questions, please contact me directly for a consulting appointment.
Cynthia Williams says
I have a problem with the overall premise of your article but I still think its really informative. I really like your other posts. Keep up the great work. If you can add more video and pictures can be much better. Because they help much clear understanding. 🙂 thanks My blog is about educational toys for toddlers.
Cynthia, I agree the blogs needs videos and pictures. I’m glad you like the rest of the blogs. What about the premise of the blog do you disagree with? Please be specific. Thank you.
Alejandrina Lofaso says
Your argument is powerful, and it’s great how you have demonstrated both sides of it. It may change the way this market operates, however it is worth remembering the possibility of more change.
woot, thankyou! I finally came to a site where the webmaster knows what they’re talking about. Do you know how many results are in Google when I search.. too many! It’s so annoying having to go from page after page after page, wasting my day away with thousands of people just copying eachother’s articles… bah. Anyway, thankyou very much for the info anyway, much appreciated.
Home remedies for acne
Have you ever considered about including a little bit more than just your articles? I mean, what you say is valuable and everything. Nevertheless think of if you added some great visuals or videos to give your posts more, “pop”! Your content is excellent but with images and videos, this site could definitely be one of the best in its niche. Very good blog!
Paul Edwards says
I agree and it my plan to add more visuals in the coming months.
Duncan Morrison says
Woah! I’m really enjoying the template/theme of this blog. It’s simple, yet effective. A lot of times it’s challenging to get that “perfect balance” between superb usability and visual appearance. I must say you’ve done a awesome job with this. In addition, the blog loads extremely fast for me on Internet explorer. Outstanding Blog!
Peter McCuaig says
Spot on with this write-up, I truly think this web site wants way more consideration. I’ll most likely be once more to read rather more, thanks for that info.
Janet McDonald says
Wow, superb blog layout! How long have you been blogging for? you made blogging look easy. The overall look of your site is magnificent, let alone the content!
Paul Robert Edwards says
Thanks for the compliment. I have been blogging for about two years and co-written 17 books with my wife, Sarah.
Elizabeth McArthur says
Hi! I could have sworn I’ve been to this website before but after browsing through some of the post I realized it’s new to me. Anyhow, I’m definitely delighted I found it and I’ll be book-marking and checking back often!
Odis Dorenfeld says
After examine just a few of the weblog posts in your website now, and I really like your manner of blogging. I bookmarked it to my bookmark web site listing and might be checking back soon. Pls check out my site as nicely and let me know what you think.
Inspirational Quotes says
Hey There. I found your blog using msn. This is an extremely well written article. I’ll make sure to bookmark it and come back to read more of Health Care for All | Elm Street Economy . Thanks for the post. I’ll definitely comeback.
Thanks for the compliment. I will put up a new blog soon.
Adela Martinetto says
I am so glad this internet thing works and your article really helped me. Might take you up on that home advice you
Thank you for responding.